The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Survey Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
DOI:
10.21249/DZHW:scs2016:1.0.0
Published at:
Nov 1, 2018
Version:
1.0.0 (current)
Access Way:
SUF: Remote-Desktop
Go to shopping cart
In case you have problems with the ordering process, please contact userservice@dzhw.eu.
Data Package scs2016

DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 

Details

Study Series:
Institution(s):
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Sponsored by:
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Project Contributors:
Johann, David;
Neufeld, Jörg
Survey Design:
Cross-Section 
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
Data Curation:
Daniel, Andreas;
Kienast, Sahra-Rebecca;
Vietgen, Sandra
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Nov 1, 2018)

Data Package Description

The DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 is an online survey for full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. As a trend study, the survey is repeated periodically. It is a follow-up to the Scientists Survey 2010 which was carried out by the Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (iFQ). The iFQ merged with the DZHW in January 2016.
Both the current and the last survey focus mainly on the research conditions of academics at German universities in regard to the changes of the German science system over the last 20 years. The survey contains questions on opinions on science politics, employment and career prospects of young academics, the peer review system, merit-based resource allocation, the acquisition of external funds and working time budgets.

Documents related to this Data Package

Data Package

Title Description Document Language File
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016  Data and Meth­ods Re­port on Sci­en­tists Sur­vey 2016  German scs2016_MethodReport_de.pdf
Overview of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016  Study Overview  English scs2016_Overview_en.pdf

Instruments

Data Sets

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Questions (128) Data Sets Variables Publications Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
71 - 80 of 128
Question 7.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
Roughly how many inquiries about appraisals in the following areas have you received in the past 12 months? 
Question 7.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
How often were you yourself involved as an evaluator in the following areas in the past 12 months? 
Question 7.5: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
How important is collaboration with academics from the following areas for your research? 
Question 7.6: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
Please assess your experiences in relation to your academic work with the following collaboration partners. 
Question 7.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Open 
In collaboration with the following partners you have had very [rather] bad experiences. Please briefly state the reasons for this. 
Question 8.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
In the following, you will find some statements which are made in the discussion about support for young academics. How do you evaluate these statements in relation to your subject area in Germany? 
Question 8.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Are you currently supervising doctoral candidates? 
Question 8.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Open 
How many doctoral candidates are you supervising as main supervisor? 
Question 8.4: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Open 
How many doctoral candidates are you supervising as co-supervisor? 
Question 8.5: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Some of the criteria that are often applied to the appraisal of dissertations are listed below. In your opinion, which of these criteria is the most important for the appraisal of dissertations? 
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
71 - 80 of 128

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.