DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Study Series:
Institution(s):
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Sponsored by:
- German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Project Contributors:
Johann, David;
Neufeld, Jörg
Survey Design:
Cross-Section
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
Data Curation:
Daniel, Andreas;
Kienast, Sahra-Rebecca;
Vietgen, Sandra
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Nov 1, 2018)
Data Package Description
The DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 is an online survey for full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. As a trend study, the survey is repeated periodically. It is a follow-up to the Scientists Survey 2010 which was carried out by the Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (iFQ). The iFQ merged with the DZHW in January 2016.
Both the current and the last survey focus mainly on the research conditions of academics at German universities in regard to the changes of the German science system over the last 20 years. The survey contains questions on opinions on science politics, employment and career prospects of young academics, the peer review system, merit-based resource allocation, the acquisition of external funds and working time budgets.
Documents related to this Data Package
Data Package
| Title | Description | Document Language | DOI | File |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016 | Data and Methods Report on Scientists Survey 2016 | German |
|
scs2016_MethodReport_de.pdf |
| Overview of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 | Study Overview | English |
|
scs2016_Overview_en.pdf |
Instruments
| Type | Description | Document Language | DOI | File |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire | applied survey instrument | German |
|
scs2016_Questionnaire_de.pdf |
| Variable Questionnaire | mapping between questions of the survey instrument and variables of the data set | German |
|
scs2016_VariableQuestionnaire_de.pdf |
| Other | Fragebogensteuerung | German |
|
scs2016_QuestionnaireControl_de.pdf |
| Other | projekteigene Referenzliste für Länder, aggregierte Länder und Weltregionen | German |
|
cl-dzhw-25.xlsx |
Data Sets
| Title | Description | Document Language | DOI | File |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variablendokumentation: DZHW-Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016 Datensatz 1 | Codebook of the first dataset of SCS2016 | German |
|
dsreport-scs2016-ds1.pdf |
Related Objects
Relevance
10
Was Wissenschaftler(innen) an Universitäten über das Promotionsrecht für Fachhochschulen denken
Johann, David; Mayer, Sabrina J.
(2017)
Johann, D. & Mayer, S. J. (2017). Was Wissenschaftler(innen) an Universitäten über das Promotionsrecht für Fachhochschulen denken. Das Hochschulwesen (HSW)(6), 169–178.
Bundesbericht Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2017. Statistische Daten und Forschungsbefunde zu Promovierenden und Promovierten in Deutschland
Konsortium Bundesbericht Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs
(2017)
Konsortium Bundesbericht Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs. (2017). Bundesbericht Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs 2017. Statistische Daten und Forschungsbefunde zu Promovierenden und Promovierten in Deutschland.
Beitrag des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses zu Lehre, Forschung und Transfer/Innovation
Tesch, Jakob; Huber, Nathalie; Neufeld, Jörg; Donner, Paul; Aman, Valeria; Gauch, Stephan
(2017)
Tesch, J., Huber, N., Neufeld, J., Donner, P., Aman, V. & Gauch, S. (2017). Beitrag des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses zu Lehre, Forschung und Transfer/Innovation. Berlin: DZHW.
Gut für Projektionen - Was Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler über die Exzellenzinitiative denken
Johann, David; Möller, Torger; Neufeld, Jörg
(2016)
Johann, D., Möller, T. & Neufeld, J. (2016). Gut für Projektionen - Was Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler über die Exzellenzinitiative denken. duz Deutsche Universitätszeitung(8), 22–23.
Performance Based Funding and Researchers Strategies for Grant Applications
Johann, David; Neufeld, Jörg
(2016)
Johann, D., & Neufeld, J. (2016). Performance Based Funding and Researchers Strategies for Grant Applications. In I. Ràfols, J. Molas-Gallart, E. Castro-Martínez, & R. Woolley (Eds.), Peripheries, frontiers and beyond. Proceedings of the 21st International...
Nachwuchsprobleme. Situation und Berufsziele des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses
Johann, David; Neufeld, Jörg
(2016)
Johann, D. & Neufeld, J. (2016). Nachwuchsprobleme. Situation und Berufsziele des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses. Forschung & Lehre(9), 790–791.
Sanktion ja, Debatte nein
Reinhart, Martin; Heßelmann, Felicitas
(2016)
Reinhart, M. & Heßelmann, F. (2016). Sanktion ja, Debatte nein. duz Deutsche Universitätszeitung(11), 14–15.
Peripheries, frontiers and beyond. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators
Ràfols, Ismael; Molas-Gallart, Jordi; Castro-Martínez, Elena; Woolley, Richard
(2016)
Ràfols, I., Molas-Gallart, J., Castro-Martínez, E. & Woolley, R. (Ed.). (2016). Peripheries, frontiers and beyond. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
Relevance
10