The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung

Sorry, something went wrong :( (500).

Data Package vorausquali

Details

Study Series:
Institution(s):
Leibniz Center for Science and Society
Sponsored by:
  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Project Contributors:
Philipps, Axel ORCID logo;
Barlösius, Eva ORCID logo;
Johannsen, Johanna ORCID logo
Survey Design:
Cross-Section 
Survey Data Type:
Qualitative Data
Data available in:
German
Data Curation:
İkiz-Akıncı, Dilek ORCID logo;
Schmidtchen, Henrike
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Mar 25, 2024)
Annotations:

This data package is the qualitative data set of the project ‘Further development of established quality assurance: What are the precausions and consensuses of a partially randomized selection of research projects in the scientific field?‘.
The data package for the quantitative survey data with professors and post-docs can be found under this Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:vorausquanti:1.0.0

Additional Links:

Data Package Description

The project "VORAUS: Further developing established quality assurance formats: Which VORreservations and consensuses does a partially randomised SELECTION of research projects encounter in the scientific field?" was funded by the BMBF from April 2019 to March 2022.
The study investigated reservations and consensus in the scientific field regarding partial randomisation. On this basis, it was clarified what is currently considered appropriate in science. Prior to a quantitative survey on the topic, the data from which is also available as a data package (DOI: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:vorausquanti:1.0.0), problem-centred interviews were conducted with scientists from different status groups in the qualitative sub-study. In a narrative part of the interviews, the interviewees were asked about their path into research. Questions were asked about their experiences with research funding, their attitudes towards ensuring scientific quality in research funding and the randomised selection of research proposals. The present data package comprises a total of 18 transcripts of six interviews each with professors, post-docs and doctoral students.

Documents related to this Data Package

Data Package

Title Description Document Language DOI File
Daten- und Methodenbericht zum qualitativen Datenpaket des Projekts „VORAUS“  The report includes information on the project, the methodological approach and data preparation.  German link_off vorausquali_Data-Methods_Report_de.pdf
Qualitative Teilstudie des Projekts „VORAUS“  Data Package Overview  German link_off vorausquali_Overview_de.pdf
Qualitative sub-study of the "VORAUS" project  Data Package Overview  English link_off vorausquali_Overview_en.pdf
Release Notes  The release notes contain information about the current version and changes compared to previous versions.  English link_off vorausquali_ReleaseNotes.md.txt

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Questions Data Sets Publications (4) Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 4 of 4
Random grant allocation from the researchers' perspective: Introducing the distinction into legitimate and illegitimate problems in Bourdieu's field theory
Barlösius, Eva; Philipps, Axel  (2022)
Barlösius, E. & Philipps, A. (2022). Random grant allocation from the researchers' perspective: Introducing the distinction into legitimate and illegitimate problems in Bourdieu's field theory. Social Science Information, 61(1), 154–178.
Verlosung von Forschungsgeldern: Welche Losverfahren können sich Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler vorstellen?
Barlösius, Eva; Philipps, Axel  (2021)
Barlösius, E. & Philipps, A. (2021). Verlosung von Forschungsgeldern: Welche Losverfahren können sich Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler vorstellen? Qualität in der Wissenschaft, 15(3 + 4), 67–72.
Lotto in der Wissenschaft: Feldinterne und -externe Widersprüche durch nichtwissenschaftliche Entscheidungsverfahren auflösen?
Barlösius, Eva; Philipps, Axel  (2020)
Barlösius, E. & Philipps, A. (2020). Lotto in der Wissenschaft: Feldinterne und -externe Widersprüche durch nichtwissenschaftliche Entscheidungsverfahren auflösen? (LCSS Working Papers Nr. 6). Hannover. https://doi.org/10.15488/10205
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists' approaches to grant lottery
Philipps, Axel  (2020)
Philipps, A. (2020). Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists' approaches to grant lottery. Research Evaluation, 30(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa027
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 4 of 4

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.