Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Title:
-
Type:
CAWI
We ask you to check the Data and Methods Report to see whether there is information on other sources for the specific question to be cited. If such information is available, we suggest that you also cite the original source(s) mentioned in the data and methods report in accordance with good scientific practice. When quoting the complete text of a question, for example within an article or when reusing the question for your own research projects or questionnaires, please note that there may be further license agreements. Please check the sources in this regard.
Documents related to the Instrument
| Type | Description | Document Language | DOI | File |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire | applied survey instrument | German |
|
scs2016_Questionnaire_de.pdf |
| Variable Questionnaire | mapping between questions of the survey instrument and variables of the data set | German |
|
scs2016_VariableQuestionnaire_de.pdf |
| Other | Fragebogensteuerung | German |
|
scs2016_QuestionnaireControl_de.pdf |
| Other | projekteigene Referenzliste für Länder, aggregierte Länder und Weltregionen | German |
|
cl-dzhw-25.xlsx |
Related Objects
Relevance
10
Question 5.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision?
Question 5.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion?
Question 5.9: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
In many journals it is usual to name funding sources which contributed funding to the research behind the studies in the ‚acknowledgments‘ . Please state how often you mention possible funding providers/funding organisations in the acknowledgments. In publications in specialist journals I...
Question 5.10: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Multiple Choice
When do you mention the funding sources involved? I mention funding sources in publications…
Question 6.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
A range of measures and proposed reforms are being discussed in the academic policy discourse about strengthening Germany as a centre for science and research. Which measures and proposed reforms do you personally consider suitable for strengthening Germany as a centre for science and research?
Question 6.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
The second funding period of the Excellence Initiative will come to an end in late 2017. Which of the following statements about the Excellence Initiative do you agree with most strongly? All in all, the Excellence Initiative was…
Question 6.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Open
Please state your reasons briefly:
Question 6.4: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How far do you agree to the following statements on the focus of the future Excellence Initiative?
Question 6.5: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Open
In your opinion, are there any other points that should be included in the design of the future Excellence Initiative?
Question 7.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
What percentage of the expenses necessary for your research (personnel and material expenses) can you cover with basic funding/basic equipment?
Relevance
10