The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Survey Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
DOI:
10.21249/DZHW:scs2016:1.0.0
Published at:
Nov 1, 2018
Version:
1.0.0 (current)
Access Way:
SUF: Remote-Desktop
Go to shopping cart
In case you have problems with the ordering process, please contact userservice@dzhw.eu.

Question 10.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 

Details

Question Number:
10.2
Question Text:
A range of very different institutions and persons is involved with examining and sanctioning academic misconduct. In relation to academic misconduct in general: in your opinion, which of the following persons or institutions are suitable for the work of exposing, examining and sanctioning misconduct? 
Question Type:
Grid 
Topic:
Academic integrity 

Images of this Question

A range of very different institutions and persons is involved with examining and sanctioning academic misconduct. In relation to academic misconduct in general: in your opinion, which of the following persons or institutions are suitable for the work of exposing, examining and sanctioning misconduct?
Resolution: 1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)

Previous Questions in Questionnaire

Question 10.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
How far were you confronted with one or more of the following types of behaviour in the past three years? Please consider the behaviour of people in your department or institute, in your subject area and in appraisal procedures. 

Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire

Question 10.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
Regardless of how serious the academic misconduct may be: in your opinion, which measures are appropriate in principle as sanctions against academic misconduct? 

Related Objects

Surveys (1) Instruments Variables Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 1 of 1
Quantitative Data, Standardised online survey 
Population: Full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. Without lecturers, without private lecturers and without non-scheduled professors. 
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample 
Field Period: Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 1 of 1

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.