Question 10.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Question Number:
10.2
Question Text:
A range of very different institutions and persons is involved with examining and sanctioning academic misconduct. In relation to academic misconduct in general: in your opinion, which of the following persons or institutions are suitable for the work of exposing, examining and sanctioning misconduct?
Question Type:
Grid
Topic:
Academic integrity
Images of this Question
Resolution:
1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)
Previous Questions in Questionnaire
Question 10.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How far were you confronted with one or more of the following types of behaviour in the past three years? Please consider the behaviour of people in your department or institute, in your subject area and in appraisal procedures.
Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire
Question 10.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
Regardless of how serious the academic misconduct may be: in your opinion, which measures are appropriate in principle as sanctions against academic misconduct?
Related Objects
Relevance
10
Quantitative Data, Standardised online survey
Population:
Full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. Without lecturers, without private lecturers and without non-scheduled professors.
Sampling Procedure:
Probability Sample
Field Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Relevance
10