Question 3.6: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Question Number:
3.6
Question Text:
How would you evaluate the written explanation?
Question Type:
Grid
Topic:
Application behaviour
Images of this Question
Resolution:
1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)
Previous Questions in Questionnaire
Question 3.5: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
Did you receive a written explanation of the reasons for refusal with excerpts from the evaluators' comments?
Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire
Question 3.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How has the quality of evaluation of funding applications developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion?
Related Objects
Relevance
10
SCHRIFTLICHE ENTSCHEIDUNGSBEGRUENDUNG: BEGUTACHTUNG FACHLICH KORREKT
v3_6_1 (numeric,
ordinal)
Contains data from these surveys:
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
SCHRIFTLICHE ENTSCHEIDUNGSBEGRUENDUNG: BEWERTUNGSMASSSTAEBE TRANSPARENT
v3_6_2 (numeric,
ordinal)
Contains data from these surveys:
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
SCHRIFTLICHE ENTSCHEIDUNGSBEGRUENDUNG: ENTSCHEIDUNG NACHVOLLZIEHBAR
v3_6_3 (numeric,
ordinal)
Contains data from these surveys:
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
SCHRIFTLICHE ENTSCHEIDUNGSBEGRUENDUNG: ANMKERUNGEN WAREN HILFREICH
v3_6_4 (numeric,
ordinal)
Contains data from these surveys:
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
SCHRIFTLICHE ENTSCHEIDUNGSBEGRUENDUNG: ANTRAG WURDE NICHT RICHTIG GELESEN
v3_6_5 (numeric,
ordinal)
Contains data from these surveys:
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
SCHRIFTLICHE ENTSCHEIDUNGSBEGRUENDUNG: ANTRAG WURDE NICHT VERSTANDEN
v3_6_6 (numeric,
ordinal)
Contains data from these surveys:
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Relevance
10