The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung

Question 5.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 

Details

Question Number:
5.8
Question Text:
How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion? 
Question Type:
Grid 
Topic:
Publication behaviour and strategies 

Images of this Question

How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion?
Resolution: 1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)

Previous Questions in Questionnaire

Question 5.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision? 

Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire

Question 5.9: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
In many journals it is usual to name funding sources which contributed funding to the research behind the studies in the ‚acknowledgments‘ . Please state how often you mention possible funding providers/funding organisations in the acknowledgments. In publications in specialist journals I... 

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Variables Concepts (0)
No search results found.

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.