DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Serial Number:
1
Population:
Full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. Without lecturers, without private lecturers and without non-scheduled professors.
Survey Unit:
Scientific Staff
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
Sampling Procedure:
Probability Sample
Survey Method:
Standardised online survey
Field Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Net Sample Size:
n = 4,844
Geographic Coverage:
Germany
Related Objects
Relevance
10
Question 3.1a: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Item Set
In the following section, we are interested in your experience with successful and unsuccessful applications. For statistical reasons we require the information on which of your applications is the most recently granted application.
Question 3.1b: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Item Set
In the following section, we are interested in your experience with successful and unsuccessful applications. For statistical reasons we require the information on which of your applications is the most recently rejected application.
Question 3.1c: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Item Set
In the following section, we are interested in your experience with successful and unsuccessful applications. For statistical reasons we require the information on which of your applications was most recently decided application.
Question 3.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How important were the following criteria for the decision to submit your most recently granted third-party funding application to the chosen funding source?
Question 3.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
Now we would like to ask you for information on your most recently rejected third-party funding application. Which of the following statements applies most closely to your most recently rejected third-party funding application?
Question 3.4: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How significant were the following reasons for the rejection in your opinion?
Question 3.5: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
Did you receive a written explanation of the reasons for refusal with excerpts from the evaluators' comments?
Question 3.6: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How would you evaluate the written explanation?
Question 3.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How has the quality of evaluation of funding applications developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion?
Question 3.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
Now please consider your most recently decided project proposal: In your estimation, how high was the funding quota (acceptance quota) in relation to the funding programme to which you submitted your most recently decided project proposal?
Relevance
10