The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung
Performance Evaluation in Appointment Procedures – The Changing Tradition of Hiring Professors in Academia
Survey Period:
Apr 30, 2015 - May 30, 2016
Survey Data Type:
Qualitative Data
DOI:
10.21249/DZHW:lib2016:1.0.0
Published at:
Oct 24, 2019
Version:
1.0.0 (current)
Access Way:
SUF: Download
Go to shopping cart
In case you have problems with the ordering process, please contact userservice@dzhw.eu.
Data Package lib2016

Performance Evaluation in Appointment Procedures – The Changing Tradition of Hiring Professors in Academia 

Details

Institution(s):
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Sponsored by:
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 
Project Contributors:
Kleimann, Bernd; In der Smitten, Susanne; Klawitter, Maren
Survey Design:
Cross-Section 
Survey Data Type:
Qualitative Data
Data Curation:
Kleimann, Bernd; İkiz-Akıncı, Dilek; Hückstädt, Malte
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Oct 24, 2019)

Data Package Description

Based on an analysis of maximally contrasting cases (institutions of higher education, subjects) it was examined how the change in appointment procedures affects the relation of the participating actors and their enactment of institutional logics. For this purpose, eight universities and four Universities of Applied Sciences (UAS) with different profiles were selected originally. The analysis is concentrated on the subjects sociology/social sciences (university + UAS), engineering (university + UAS), physics (university) and medicine (university) in order to cover subject-specific differences (concerning tasks, work processes, endowment of the professorship, disciplinary performance standards, etc.). A total of 76 guideline-based expert interviews were conducted with university heads, deans, chairpersons of appointments committees, equal opportunities commissioners of selected institutions of higher education. The respective requirements, experiences with and assessment of appointment procedures were in the focus. This sample was reduced to the status group of chairpersons of appointments committees. For further information on the sample rationale and data editing method please consult the Data and Methods Report.

Documents related to this Data Package

Data Package

Title Description Document Language File
LiBerTas 2016  Data and Methods Report of the Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016  German lib2016_Data-Methods_Report.pdf
LiBerTas 2016  Study Overview of the Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016  German lib2016_Overview_de.pdf
LiBerTas 2016  Study Overview of the Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016  English lib2016_Overview_en.pdf
LiBerTas 2016  Citation Guideline of the Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016  German lib2016_Citation_Guideline.pdf
LiBerTas 2016  Release Notes  English lib2016_ReleaseNotes.md

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Questions Data Sets (1) Publications Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 1 of 1
Interview Transcripts, Interview Guideline, Transcription Guideline 
Individual Data 
Contains data from these surveys: 
Qualitative Inquiry of the DZHW Study LiBerTas 2016 
Access Ways: SUF: Download
Observations (max.):  9
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 1 of 1

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.