The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Survey Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
DOI:
10.21249/DZHW:scs2016:1.0.0
Published at:
Nov 1, 2018
Version:
1.0.0 (current)
Access Way:
SUF: Remote-Desktop
Go to shopping cart
In case you have problems with the ordering process, please contact userservice@dzhw.eu.
Data Package scs2016

DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 

Details

Study Series:
Institution(s):
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Sponsored by:
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Project Contributors:
Johann, David;
Neufeld, Jörg
Survey Design:
Cross-Section 
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
Data Curation:
Daniel, Andreas;
Kienast, Sahra-Rebecca;
Vietgen, Sandra
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Nov 1, 2018)

Data Package Description

The DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 is an online survey for full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. As a trend study, the survey is repeated periodically. It is a follow-up to the Scientists Survey 2010 which was carried out by the Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (iFQ). The iFQ merged with the DZHW in January 2016.
Both the current and the last survey focus mainly on the research conditions of academics at German universities in regard to the changes of the German science system over the last 20 years. The survey contains questions on opinions on science politics, employment and career prospects of young academics, the peer review system, merit-based resource allocation, the acquisition of external funds and working time budgets.

Documents related to this Data Package

Data Package

Title Description Document Language File
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016  Data and Meth­ods Re­port on Sci­en­tists Sur­vey 2016  German scs2016_MethodReport_de.pdf
Overview of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016  Study Overview  English scs2016_Overview_en.pdf

Instruments

Data Sets

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Questions (128) Data Sets Variables Publications Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
81 - 90 of 128
Question 8.6: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
In your opinion, which of these criteria is the second most important for the appraisal of dissertations? 
Question 8.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Does your faculty have binding rules for registering doctoral candidates? 
Question 8.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
With what percentage of your doctoral candidates have you completed a written supervision agreement? Proportion in percent. 
Question 8.9: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Did your doctoral supervisor complete a written supervision agreement with you? 
Question 8.10: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Multiple Choice 
We are interested in the content of this supervision agreement. Which of the following points are included in it?,We are interested in the content of this supervision agreement. Which of the following points are usually included in it? 
Question 8.11: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
We are interested in how far the period following the doctorate is already a topic in conversations with your doctoral supervisor. Please state which of the following statements apply and which do not. 
Question 8.12: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Recently the idea of permitting Universities of Applied Science to award doctorates has been discussed. What is your opinion on this topic? 
Question 8.12b: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Open 
Please briefly state the reasons for your opinion on the right to award doctorates. 
Question 8.13: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Were there job vacancies for academic positions (excluding professorships) in your department or organisational unit during the last 24 months? 
Question 8.14: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
Was it possible to find suitably qualified people to fill these positions? 
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
81 - 90 of 128

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.