The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung

Sorry, something went wrong :( (500).

Data Package vorausquanti

Details

Study Series:
Institution(s):
Leibniz Center for Science and Society
Sponsored by:
  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Project Contributors:
Philipps, Axel ORCID logo;
Barlösius, Eva ORCID logo;
Johannsen, Johanna
Survey Design:
Cross-Section 
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
Data available in:
German
Data Curation:
Daniel, Andreas ORCID logo
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Sep 18, 2024)
Annotations:

This data package is the quantitative data set of the study ‘Further development of established quality assurance: What are the precausions and consensuses of a partially randomized selection of research projects in the scientific field?‘.
The qualitative data package, the interview transcripts with professors, post-docs and doctoral candidates, can be found here: https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:vorausquali:1.0.0

Additional Links:
Allowed use cases:
  • scientific use
  • teaching purposes

Data Package Description

The BMBF-funded study ‘Further development of established quality assurance: What are the precausions and consensuses of a partially randomized selection of research projects in the scientific field?‘ was conducted from April 2019 to March 2022. The study elaborates reservations and understandings in the scientific field about partial randomization and clarifies what is currently considered scientifically adequate. For this purpose, a quantitative survey was carried out with scientists in Lower Saxony in the fields of biology, chemistry, physics as well as in engineering and history. Questions were asked about assessments and attitudes towards the peer review process, research funding and the lottery procedure. In addition to socio-demographic and job-related information, also questions were asked about experiences in the peer review process and with research proposals. Then, in the qualitative sub-study, problem-centered interviews were conducted with scientists in different status groups. This data is also available as a data package (DOI). The data package of the quantitative sub-study contains a data set with 283 cases and 115 variables.

Documents related to this Data Package

Data Package

Title Description Document Language DOI File
Quantitative sub-study of the study "VORAUS"  Data Package Overview  English link_off vorausquanti_Overview_en.pdf
Quantitative Teilstudie der Studie "VORAUS"  Data Package Overview  German link_off vorausquanti_Overview_de.pdf
Daten- und Methodenbericht des Datenpakets "Quantitative Teilstudie der Studie "VORAUS""  The report includes general information on the data package.  German link_off vorausquanti_Daten-und_Methodenbericht_1_0_0.pdf
Release Notes  The release notes contain information about the current version and changes compared to previous versions.  English link_off vorausquanti_ReleaseNotes.md

Instruments

Type Description Document Language DOI File
Questionnaire  Questionnaire of the study Voraus  German  link_off vorausquanti_Fragebogen.pdf

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Questions Data Sets Variables Publications (1) Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 1 of 1
Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists’ views on peer review and lottery
Philipps, Axel  (2022)
Philipps, A. (2022). Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists’ views on peer review and lottery. Science and Public Policy, 49(3), 365–377.
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
1 - 1 of 1

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.