The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Survey Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
DOI:
10.21249/DZHW:scs2016:1.0.0
Published at:
Nov 1, 2018
Version:
1.0.0 (current)
Access Way:
SUF: Remote-Desktop
Go to shopping cart
In case you have problems with the ordering process, please contact userservice@dzhw.eu.

Question 5.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 

Details

Question Number:
5.7
Question Text:
Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision? 
Question Type:
Grid 
Topic:
Publication behaviour and strategies 

Images of this Question

Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision?
Resolution: 1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)

Previous Questions in Questionnaire

Question 5.6: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
Have all submitted manuscripts of which you are (co-)author been accepted without requiring minor or major revisions? 

Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire

Question 5.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion? 

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Variables Concepts (0)
No search results found.

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.