Question 5.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Question Number:
5.8
Question Text:
How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion?
Question Type:
Grid
Topic:
Publication behaviour and strategies
Images of this Question
Resolution: 1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)
Previous Questions in Questionnaire
Question 5.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type: Grid
Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision?
Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire
Question 5.9: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type: Single Choice
In many journals it is usual to name funding sources which contributed funding to the research behind the studies in the ‚acknowledgments‘ . Please state how often you mention possible funding providers/funding organisations in the acknowledgments. In publications in specialist journals I...
Related Objects
Relevance
10
Quantitative Data, Standardised online survey
Population: Full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. Without lecturers, without private lecturers and without non-scheduled professors.
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample
Field Period: Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Relevance
10