Question 5.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Details
Question Number:
5.7
Question Text:
Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision?
Question Type:
Grid
Topic:
Publication behaviour and strategies
Images of this Question
Resolution:
1200 x 637 (Depending on the screen resolution, the question was displayed differently.)
Previous Questions in Questionnaire
Question 5.6: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Single Choice
Have all submitted manuscripts of which you are (co-)author been accepted without requiring minor or major revisions?
Subsequent Questions in Questionnaire
Question 5.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Question Type:
Grid
How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion?
Related Objects
Relevance
10
Quantitative Data, Standardised online survey
Population:
Full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. Without lecturers, without private lecturers and without non-scheduled professors.
Sampling Procedure:
Probability Sample
Field Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Relevance
10