The app could not be started successfully!

Upgrade or use a different browser to experience this app.

Logo des Forschungsdatenzentrums des Deutschen Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung
DZHW Scientists Survey 2016
Survey Period:
Mar 15, 2016 - May 8, 2016
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
DOI:
10.21249/DZHW:scs2016:1.0.0
Published at:
Nov 1, 2018
Version:
1.0.0 (current)
Access Way:
SUF: Remote-Desktop
Go to shopping cart
In case you have problems with the ordering process, please contact userservice@dzhw.eu.
Data Package scs2016

DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 

Details

Study Series:
Institution(s):
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Sponsored by:
German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Project Contributors:
Johann, David;
Neufeld, Jörg
Survey Design:
Cross-Section 
Survey Data Type:
Quantitative Data
Data Curation:
Daniel, Andreas;
Kienast, Sahra-Rebecca;
Vietgen, Sandra
DOI:
Version:
1.0.0 (published at Nov 1, 2018)

Data Package Description

The DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 is an online survey for full-time academic and artistic personnel at German universities, teacher training colleges, theological colleges, art and music colleges as well as medical schools. As a trend study, the survey is repeated periodically. It is a follow-up to the Scientists Survey 2010 which was carried out by the Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (iFQ). The iFQ merged with the DZHW in January 2016.
Both the current and the last survey focus mainly on the research conditions of academics at German universities in regard to the changes of the German science system over the last 20 years. The survey contains questions on opinions on science politics, employment and career prospects of young academics, the peer review system, merit-based resource allocation, the acquisition of external funds and working time budgets.

Documents related to this Data Package

Data Package

Title Description Document Language File
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016  Data and Meth­ods Re­port on Sci­en­tists Sur­vey 2016  German scs2016_MethodReport_de.pdf
Overview of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016  Study Overview  English scs2016_Overview_en.pdf

Instruments

Data Sets

Related Objects

Surveys Instruments Questions (128) Data Sets Variables Publications Concepts
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
61 - 70 of 128
Question 5.7: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
Please think back to your manuscript that was most recently rejected by a journal or evaluated as requiring minor or major revisions. How do you assess the evaluators' comments or the editors' decision? 
Question 5.8: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
How has the quality of manuscript evaluation by journals developed in the last 5 years, in your opinion? 
Question 5.9: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
In many journals it is usual to name funding sources which contributed funding to the research behind the studies in the ‚acknowledgments‘ . Please state how often you mention possible funding providers/funding organisations in the acknowledgments. In publications in specialist journals I... 
Question 5.10: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Multiple Choice 
When do you mention the funding sources involved? I mention funding sources in publications… 
Question 6.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
A range of measures and proposed reforms are being discussed in the academic policy discourse about strengthening Germany as a centre for science and research. Which measures and proposed reforms do you personally consider suitable for strengthening Germany as a centre for science and research? 
Question 6.2: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
The second funding period of the Excellence Initiative will come to an end in late 2017. Which of the following statements about the Excellence Initiative do you agree with most strongly? All in all, the Excellence Initiative was… 
Question 6.3: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Open 
Please state your reasons briefly: 
Question 6.4: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Grid 
How far do you agree to the following statements on the focus of the future Excellence Initiative? 
Question 6.5: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Open 
In your opinion, are there any other points that should be included in the design of the future Excellence Initiative? 
Question 7.1: Questionnaire of the DZHW Scientists Survey 2016 
Question Type: Single Choice 
What percentage of the expenses necessary for your research (personnel and material expenses) can you cover with basic funding/basic equipment? 
Sort by
Relevance
Items per page
10
61 - 70 of 128

We use cookies for the statistical evaluation of visitor numbers to our website. By continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can find more information in the data protection statement.